Please register and get access to full articles.
Welcome to our blog – a place to discuss and exchange thoughts and ideas about iX-7 Asset Management SA, the stock markets and all matters relating to wealth management.
From Zurich to Seoul, from New York to Paris, the same reality echoes: walls are becoming a luxury.What was once a cornerstone of middle-class stability has turned into a source of anxiety, debt, and exclusion.
The housing crisis is no longer a local or cyclical event — it’s structural, global, and deeply political.Behind the rising prices lie three forces reshaping the world economy: decades of cheap money, chronic underbuilding, and a shift in the social meaning of property.
For nearly two decades, ultra-low interest rates fueled a construction and credit boom. Real estate became both an investment haven and a speculative asset, pushing prices upward even as wages stagnated.
When central banks began raising rates after 2022, a silent chain reaction began:
Mortgage costs soared.
Developers froze projects.
Tenants faced skyrocketing rents.
In many major cities, owning a home now requires 10 to 15 years of income, a figure once unimaginable.
Governments tried to tame the market with rent caps or subsidies, but these measures only addressed the symptoms. The structural imbalance, too much financial demand, too little livable space, remains.
Every crisis has its winners. For institutional investors, real estate remains a hedge against inflation.For landlords, rising rents are a steady return. But for the majority, housing insecurity is spreading.
Young adults delay leaving their parents’ homes. Families are pushed out of urban centers.Middle-income workers spend over 40% of their salary just to keep a roof.
And yet, paradoxically, owning a home has never carried such social weight. In today’s societies, property ownership is no longer only about shelter, it’s about recognition. It signifies stability, success, and belonging; proof that one has “made it” within a system that increasingly excludes.
The fewer people can afford it, the more powerful the symbol becomes.
This creates a double game: while the material function of housing weakens , harder to access, more precarious, its symbolic value strengthens. To “own one’s walls” is to affirm one’s place in a hierarchy that itself has become increasingly fragile.
Governments oscillate between tax reforms, incentives for developers, and public housing projects, but rarely question this deeper contradiction:
housing has turned into a financial product before being a social necessity,and a status symbol before being a right.
The challenge ahead is not only economic but cultural. If housing is a pillar of social cohesion, then its privatization and financialization threaten the very structure of society.
Cities experiment with new models:
Cooperative ownership and community land trusts in Scandinavia and Germany.
Public-private housing initiatives in Singapore and Vienna.
Vacancy taxes and foreign buyer restrictions in Canada and New Zealand.
Each approach seeks to rebalance a distorted equation: how to make housing both livable and sustainable, profitable yet fair.
But these are patchworks, not yet a paradigm shift. What’s missing is a redefinition of housing itself:not just as property, but as infrastructure for life, like water, transport, or education.
The housing crisis reveals more than an economic imbalance, it exposes a moral contradiction.We built societies where security, dignity, and status all depend on property, then made property inaccessible to most.
As interest rates, demographics, and climate policies reshape the landscape, the question is no longer “who can buy?” but “what does owning mean?”
Because in the 21st century, the price of walls is not only financial , it’s social, cultural, and political.And how we redefine that price may determine the stability of our democracies themselves.
Knowledge is power.
